I
just finished a research about an old technique for building walls which we
should keep alive and try to spread all over the world. I’m talking about
rammed earth.
Together
with its “sister” solutions, namely adobe and earth bags, rammed earth is a very
eco-friendly alternative to the conventional wood or concrete framing.
Evidence of the early use of rammed earth has been seen in Neolithic archaeological sites along the Yellow River in China, dating back to 5000 BCE and much of the Great Wall of China is made using an earlier method of rammed earth construction.
From my previous studies I have knowledge of
rammed earth constructions in the Portuguese tradition as well as in the
Australian aborigines' past. In the southwestern United States, adobe walls far
exceed the use of rammed earth, but now the latter is starting to appear in
building codes.
Rammed earth is a method of building walls
whereby a mixture of earth is compacted in layers between a temporary frame,
usually made of wood or plywood; it must be sturdy and well braced, and
the two opposing wall faces clamped together. Damp material is poured in to a
depth of 4 to 10 inches and then compacted to around 50% of its original
height.
Most rammed earth builders use
pneumatic rammers to compact the earth within the forms. As each form is
filled, another form is placed above it, and the process begins again. Once a
wall is complete, it is strong enough for the frames to be immediately removed.
Construction is best done in warm weather so that the walls can dry and harden.
The
soil mix needs to be carefully balanced between clay, sand and aggregate. Modern advances in the technology include the
addition of a small percentage of cement, better structural design methods, the
inclusion of damp courses and concrete footings and regulatory controls by
building authorities. It is also possible to add a water repellent admix to the
soil mixture.
The
soils used are typically subsoils low in clay. Clay/sand ratio has
the greatest contributing effect on how well an earth wall will perform.
Traditionally it has been established as 30% clay and 70% sand (when using
cement as a stabilizer, clay content can be reduced as low as 8% to 10%).
Most
site soils can be used in some proportion to create a useable formulation,
checking first gradation, USCS soil type, and in some cases a plasticity index.
Clay
particles help to bind together the soil matrix. Coarse sands with a good
distribution of particle sizes are usually better than fine or uniform
sand. Cracked or crushed gravel is better than “pea” or river gravel
because of its angularity.
Because
of their thickness and density, rammed earth walls provide high thermal mass:
this means that heat or cold penetration of the wall is very slow and the
internal temperature of the building remains relatively stable. Thickness and
density also provide great noise reduction; plus earth doesn’t burn, is
non-toxic, non-polluting and ‘breathes’. On the other hand, rammed earth homes
might take more work to meet with approval by building officials, bankers and insurers.
Given
the many advantages of this solution, why isn’t it widespread and records so
few cases of use, in Italy for example? Is rammed earth not adaptable to many
conditions? Or more likely the building regulations tend to exclude it to be
better protected and cautious? I‘ll keep researching.




















